Telephone 020 8295 5877
Telephone 020 8295 5877
As global collaboration becomes the norm, teams increasingly span borders, time zones and cultures. While this diversity brings a wealth of perspectives and ideas, it also introduces challenges — particularly in cross-cultural communication. Without a shared understanding, miscommunication becomes the biggest risk to team effectiveness.
Effective communication and collaboration depend on the informal understanding among the parties that is based on the trust that has developed between them. However, the meaning of trust, and how it is developed and communicated varies across cultures. In China and Japan for example, business transactions are based on networks of long-standing relationships based on trust rather than on the formal contracts and task-oriented relationships typical of the US. Where there is trust, implicit understanding arises within communication. It allows communicators to adjust to unforeseen circumstances with less conflict that would be the case with formal contracts, and it allows open communication in exchanging ideas and information.
According to a Harvard Business Review analysis, the merger ultimately failed due to cultural mismatches that undermined collaboration. For example, the merger between German automaker Daimler-Benz and American company Chrysler in the late 1990s serves as a cautionary tale. Despite the potential for synergy, the merger failed largely due to cultural clashes. Daimler-Benz's hierarchical and formal culture conflicted with Chrysler's more relaxed and egalitarian approach. These differences led to misaligned expectations and communication breakdowns, ultimately resulting in the dissolution of the merger.
Understanding and addressing these differences through cross-cultural training programmes is essential for fostering effective collaboration and achieving success.
Communication styles vary significantly across cultures, with some favouring directness and others preferring indirectness. Recognising and adapting to these styles is crucial for effective cross-cultural communication.
For people in cultures that rank high on task-orientation (for example, the US, Denmark), presenting objective information in a direct and explicit way is an important and expected manner of communication. This contracts with people in relationship-oriented cultures (for example, the Middle East) who prefer a more indirect approach, preferring a two-way discourse and friendly relations.
Furthermore, many cultures make avoiding conflict a priority (for example, Japan, The Philippines) and tend to communicate with the goal of being supportive of people rather than outright achievement of objective results. Speech is to promote harmony. This contracts with people from Denmark or Netherlands, who prefer negative feedback to be provided frankly and honestly. Truth is prioritised over diplomacy.
Overlay these preferences with the fact that at most global meetings, the common language is English. This gives native-English speakers a clear advantage in discussions. However, some cultures (for example, the UK) also tend to use a particular form of coded language, using well-tried, formal but subtle expressions to disguise intent or confront others. This speech makes it difficult for others to challenge.
To minimise this advantage, non-native English speakers must use effective communication strategies whilst using their second language and familiarise themselves with tricky phases such as:
Direct communicators value clarity and straightforwardness. They express opinions and feedback openly, expecting others to do the same. This style is common in countries like Germany, Finland and France.
Indirect communicators prioritise harmony and often convey messages subtly to avoid confrontation. This style is prevalent in cultures such as Japan and India.
When team members are unaware of these differences, misinterpretations can occur. A direct communicator may perceive an indirect communicator as evasive, while the latter may find the former blunt or rude. Such misunderstandings can hinder collaboration and trust within the team.
Below are strategies for adjusting your communication in the workplace to work more effectively with people from other backgrounds.
Cross-cultural training programmes are designed to bridge communication gaps, promote cultural intelligence and strengthen global collaboration. These programmes offer numerous benefits:
To maximise the benefits of cross-cultural training, we recommend that organisations consider the following steps:
Miscommunication due to cultural differences is a significant risk in global teams, but it is a challenge that can be addressed through awareness and education. By investing in cross-cultural training programmes, organisations can equip their employees with the skills needed to navigate diverse work environments, leading to improved collaboration, innovation and overall success.
Embracing cultural diversity not only mitigates risks but also unlocks the full potential of global teams.
Babel offers a range of flexible delivery formats to suit your team’s needs:
Want to unlock your team’s full potential through intercultural communication? Explore Babel’s tailored cross-cultural training programmes today.
“Excellent, very interactive, relevant and tailored to our business. Thank you.”
Developing World-Class Customer Service
St James
"Each year the Babel module is rated 'outstanding' by our graduates. They feel really engaged and encouraged to learn and although some of them may have studied these topics at university, they have never experienced the content within such a multi-cultural group and the advice offered by top trainers. The graduates are excited to network with fellow colleagues from different offices and cultures and Babel's programme enables us to do this perfectly."
Graduate Development Programme
Subsea7